Local Historical Weather Events and Facts

 

  ADDITIONS MADE:

  22.10.12. - new entry for 1873 for Great Strickland.

  

GREAT STRICKLAND

  The earliest of all the information that I have found to date is provided by a H.H. Plumer esq. from Great Strickland and once again it is taken from the British Rainfall Guides.

  In 1865 when the guides only had 600 reporting stations nationally, Great Strickland was one of them; virtually there at the very infancy of rainfall recording!

  Plumer provided rainfall records for the period 1865-78 and this makes for a most interesting and valuable 14 year record - in 1878 Plumer is described in the guides as 'The late H. Plumer' and in the 1879 edition Great Strickland is shown as 'Obs ceased.'!

  In the 1867 edition there is a 'study of rain gauges within the Lake District and their results' and Plumer's is included in this year and despite just three years worth of data is accredited a mean rainfall of 38.0".

Plumer employed a gauge set at 1 ft 6" (until 1873 when it becomes just 1ft) above the ground and his site was 650 ft asl.

  I'm of the opinion that he did not read his gauge every day as the number of rain days that he records appears to be too low and as already mentioned above, this was quite common. When compared with the figures obtained by Mrs. Whiteside (1899-1917), shown below, then the number of 'Rain Days' recorded by Plumer do indeed seem to be on the low side.

  Plumer does submit some comments to the guides in relation to the year just passed:

  1865 - 'We have reason to think that high winds affects the quantity of rain which enters the gauge, there been a great deal more flood on a windy day, on which we registered a less quantity than there was on a calm day, on which we registered a greater quantity - does it blow over the gauge?

  It has been by far the driest year here for a long time, places being dried up which have never been so before in the memory of the oldest inhabitant, yet we had 36 inches of rain, but it was concentrated in a few months.'

  1868 - 'The driest May, June and July by far that I have ever recorded, and yet, owing principally to the extra ordinary fall in January and December, the total rainfall in the year is larger than any other that I have noticed.'

  1869 - 'This year, like 1868, has been divided into two strongly marked periods, the one dry, the other very wet, the result being in both cases that the total rainfall far exceeded the average.'

  1872 - 'The year 1872 (59.19) has been wetter by 10.82 in. than any year that I have recorded, and falling on 27 more days.'

  1873 - 'The driest year I have ever recorded, and, perhaps the coldest.'

 

 Maximum Falls in 24 Hrs for 1865-67.

For the period 1865-67 the guides listed the maximum fall for a 24 hour period for all of the reporting stations and hence, at least for Great Strickland and probably locally, we do know the wettest day for each of those years and strangely none occured in the winter months, they are:

  1865 -    1.78" (45.2 mm) - 29th May

  1866 -    1.25" (31.8 mm) - 29th August

  1867 -    1.07" (27.2 mm) - 23rd March

  The annual rainfall amounts for the years in which Plumer kept records are:

Rainfall at Great Strickland 1865 - 1878
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
MEAN
INCHES
MM's
RAIN DAYS
35.87
911.1
129
46.00
1168.4
192
33.55
852.2
166
48.37
1228.6
200
44.67
1134.6
183
35.31
896.9
164
38.12
968.2
186
59.16*
1502.7
227
31.48
799.6
204
45.34
1151.6
233
35.01
889.2
---
39.40
1000.8
---
53.69
1363.7
228
36.27
921.3
152
41.59
1056.3
188.66

 

  * The 1872 edition shows 59.19" with the corrected figure of 59.16" appearing in the 'Errata' section in 1873.

  I must say that I find these figures more than intriguing as much for the fact that I find them just as reliable, if not more so than those of Reagill and Crosby Ravensworth.

  I might have expected something more in the range of 43-45" for Great Strickland, but these figures, at least in my own mind, don't leave any room for doubt.

  Making a direct comparison with those of Crosby Ravensworth for the 10 year period 1869-78 we find that Great Strickland averaged 41.848" and Crosby Ravensworth was significantly greater at 50.98".

  When we then include the 7 years of Reagill, 45.71", to make a comparison, Great Strickland had 42.91" and Crosby Ravensworth 50.94" - the margin has reduced slightly.

  But then why not just compare to 19 years worth of data from another site in Great Strickland?

 

 Mrs. Whiteside 1899 - 1917

  Moving forward to 1899 and we find that a Mrs. Whiteside of Greencroft now had a rain gauge in the village and this was the case up to and including 1917. She used a 5" diameter gauge set at 2ft above the ground. Mrs. Whiteside is listed as a new observer in 1899, but there is no mention in 1918 (or later years) as to the reason why she ceased recording.

  So this is now becoming most useful in that comparisons using quite a large amount of data can be made between sites within the same village, but separated by a few years. Then also between Gt. Strickland and Morland for 16 years and then to try and make some sense out of it all.

  Mrs. Whiteside's rainfall records are:

Rainfall at Great Strickland 1899 - 1917
1889
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
AVERAGE
INCHES
MM's
RAIN DAYS
37.63
955.8
178
44.94
1141.5
214
30.95
786.1
188
34.06
865.1
190
60.63
1540.0
234
36.97
939.0
205
32.06
814.3
206
38.66
981.9
209
39.12
993.6
203
33.32
846.3
192
38.44
976.4
194
40.51
1028.9
196
46.74
1187.2
201
44.10
1120.1
220
38.47
977.1
177
43.99
1117.3
193
36.65
930.9
184
47.51
1206.7
244
34.85
885.2
201
39.98
1015.5
201.5

 

  19 years is a very good point at which to make comparisons and just 1.61 inch (40.9 mm) per year is all that separates the gauges of Plumer and Whiteside and this is comfortably within any margin of error to leave me with no doubts over the validity of these figures.

  The year 1903 was certainly a notable one (it was the wettest year recorded in the Morland series) and the greatest percentage difference (18.5%) between that recorded in Great Strickland to that at Morland occurred in this year. Indeed during 1902-17 the percentage difference between the two villages varied widely (with no obvious theme developing) and then 1908 throws up the one occasion when Morland actually recorded more rain in a year.

  For the period 1902-17 Great Strickland averaged 40.38 inch rain on 203 days annually to that of 37.02 inch on 211.6 days at Morland.

  But so often little oddities crop up and in this case it is the number of days on which rain was recorded. Despite greater annual rainfall Great Strickland manages to have rain on fewer days, 8.6 days per year. That shouldn't be the case. I have already alluded to the fact that the Morland figures (Rain days) do seem high during the period 1902-09 (and just beyond) and the Strickland figures possibly emphasises this.

 

 

© Darren Rogers 2012

Want to comment on this site or do you have any information that you would like to see included on this page? Please contact - email